Nadal V Federer

Nadal
Not only want to win, but also think hard about how to win.
Federer
Absolutely, genius! the most comprehensive skill player, so he win all the honours. we must not only see his happy on stage, but also know his hardworking for that time.

Let us have a look at what John Mcenroe says:
Perhaps you can blame Conners and myself, Nastase and a few of others, because they tightened the rules after us to the point where you felt they would have preferred some robots out there. The last communist systems in the world are North Korea and Cuba, and they don't seem to be doing that well, but it seems the ATP hung on to that so long, even they realised that it was a big mistake.
In a one on one game, you need tp promote personality and passion; that's what fas realte to. When you make this amount of monney in a sport, you've got to try to give these young kids perspective on how great tennis is-but it looks like the joy of the game has been taken out to a large degree.
So it's refereshing to see Rafael Nadal junp up and down, looking like the's fired up to play. I admit that I didn't enjoy it as much as I could have, which is all the more reason I would tell someone like Anday Murray-who people say reminds them of me-that it's all negative energy when he gets like that. The reason Nadal's sp great is that he plays harder and ties harder, and has a love of competition. If you unbridle that, you see that results, most guys walk around like it's a job. But it doesn't necessaruly mean that because you don't yell at an umpire, the days of personalities in tennis are over.